追 擊 新 聞

 

海內外幹中時


Stone  於 2001/03/12 22:53
發表內容:

Fuckchina 及 沒水準兄﹕

以下是石頭寫去Newsweek老編的抗議文。 請看看﹐ 如果這tamplate可用的話﹐ 拜託大夥兒一起寫信去告狀。

Newsweek: [email protected];
路透社﹕[email protected]
NBC: [email protected]


To the Editor:

Kudos to Mr. Mahlon Meyer for his excellent analysis in "The Birth Of A New Taipei".
Owing to the remarkable efforts of its residents, Taipei has indeed transformed
most radically and wonderfully among its peers in Asia. Mr. Meyer was correct to
further point out that "this transformation has also been fueled by the same forces
that have driven Taiwan's democratic reforms. As native-born Taiwanese took control
of the government, they began to treat the capital as home, rather than simply a pit
stop on the way to retaking China." In fact, citizens demand for better policies and
infrastructure leading to a modern, civil society largely fell through deaf ears in the
past while KMT enjoyed monopoly of Taiwan's political landscape. It wasn't until the
native-born Chen Shui-bian became the city mayor in 1994 when such policies began
to be instituted and enforced in earnest. The main driving force behind Taipei's recent
transformation is the combination of the "nativization" of the government and the
empowerment of its citizens. Mr. Meyer's keen observation finds countless testimonials
from long time residents of Taipei such as myself.

It's rather ironic that ChinaTimes completely omitted the above key points when citing
Mr. Meyer's report on March 6, 2001 【http://news.chinatimes.com/Chinatimes/newscontent/newscontent/0,1058,1120010
30601853+11050601+20010306,00.html】. Instead, its "partially" translated version misled the readers to think that Mr. Meyer
believed the transformation owed its success to the government's(KMT) lifting of martial
law in 1987.

I feel the need to bring to your attention such blatant distortion and disrespect for
journalistic authenticity. As a reader, I can understand that ChinaTimes needs to take a
pro-KMT editorial stand as it is closely affiliated with KMT party heavy weights both
financially and politically. However, when it comes to news reporting, certain ethical
standard still needs to be observed. A rebuttal (and correction) from Mr. Meyer, the
original source, might be in need.


Respectfully,

 

 

〈看後續討論〉

 

 

小布希對中美撞機事件所發表的聲明

【思考】美中撞機事件的真的是個意外嗎!?

布希-錢3月22日與媒體見面

美國副國務卿任命案。台灣媒體怎麼說﹖

中國新聞-選擇性報導?

海內外幹中時

哈哈哈,有趣!有趣!抓不完的外電小辮子...

看不到的紐約時報報導

魏京生直言:新政府對中共軟弱

TVBS的另一波腥風血雨

明日報謝忠良唱衰"台灣的主張"

注意你家的有線電視

新聞比較

重要証據不查証,新新聞說?

又一篇文不對題的報導

時代周刊原文與翻譯..聯合晚報惡意斷章取義

中時邱詩文記者偽造美國對兩岸關係的看法

這是奧義問題嗎? - 中時潘勛記者請進

伍崇韜報導,讀者一頭霧

〈又見神奇火箭砲--媒體無需隨香港某些不實報導起舞〉

小心﹗中國走狗媒體的招數﹗