先進感測器專欄

回應本題 自選底色↑ 返 回


flak  於 2003/01/08 10:25
先進感測器專欄

這幾年來,前蘇聯努力的把以前作的飛機飛彈戰艦拿出來推銷,讓有些人覺得歐美好像在原地踏步。事實上,歐美國家專注於訊息戰的發展,對各種感測器(訊息來源)與通信手段(訊息傳遞)都有極具野心的大規模計畫,只是對載具的發展較為冷漠。

本專欄收集各種「先進」(不要給我看到什麼舊東西)感測器的新聞與評論,就這樣。


NO:32_1
flak  於 2003/01/08 10:34
Litening Targeting and Navigation Pod Add Data/Video Link

Lightening莢艙的命運很有趣,它是以色列發展的,但卻在以色列輸了F-15I的競標給LM的LANTIRN。而當LANTIRN挾其龐大既有市場優勢風捲殘雪時,NG看準LGB的大量運用將使更多戰機具有標定莢艙的潛在市場,與以色列合作改良Lightening成為第三代紅外線,在美國二線部隊(國民兵、海陸)反而擊敗第二代的LANTIRN,搶奪大批市場。

第三代紅外線的特色是利用多×多的數十萬至百萬像素的紅外線陣列,提供2倍以上的解析度與偵測距離,這不但完善了標定莢艙+LGB的既有搭配,也吸引了其他用途的應用。在這篇報導中,美國政府資助NG進行一個研發計畫,將Lightening加上數位資料鍵,使其可以即時將影像傳輸回基地。這不但加速了BDA(戰果評估),也使得標定莢艙可以進一步作為指揮官的偵蒐工具。

Northrop Grumman Modifies Litening Targeting and Navigation Pod To Establish Data/Video Link

(Source: Northrop Grumman; issued Jan. 6, 2003)

ROLLING MEADOWS, Ill. --- Northrop Grumman Corporations Electronic Systems sector has successfully modified a Litening Extended Range (ER) targeting and navigation pod to enable a data link between a U.S. Marine AV-8B aircraft and a ground station for a Pioneer unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).

Modifications to the Litening ER involved mounting a government-furnished equipment (GFE) data/video link transmitter compatible with the Pioneer UAV system in the pod, along with a commercial off-the-shelf transmit antenna. Operational evaluation flight missions of the AV-8B aircraft equipped with the modified Litening pod were then conducted at the Marine Corps Air Station in Yuma, Ariz., where cockpit imagery from the pod was successfully relayed to a Pioneer ground station via the GFE transmitter. The modification took less than one month to complete and had no adverse effects on the normal functioning of the pod.

“Northrop Grumman is very proud of the government-industry teamwork that made this flight demonstration such a success” said Michael Lennon, vice president of Targeting and Surveillance Programs at Northrop Grummans Defensive Systems Division in Rolling Meadows. “Our team effectively demonstrated how targeting imagery can be relayed to decision makers in real time. Fielding such a capability will greatly increase the situational awareness of our combat forces.”

Litening ER is a self-contained, multisensor laser target designating and navigation system that enables fighter pilots to detect, acquire, track and identify ground targets for highly accurate delivery of both conventional and precision-guided weapons. Litening ER features include a 640 x 512 pixel forward-looking infrared camera; charge-coupled device television; laser spot tracker/range finder; infrared marker; and a laser designator.

In addition to being fielded on Marine Corps AV-8Bs, Litening pods are now in use on U.S. Air National Guard (ANG) and the U.S. Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) F-16s and are operational with the Italian and Spanish navies.

Northrop Grummans Defensive Systems Division is a component of the companys Baltimore, Md.-based Electronic Systems sector, a world leader in the design, development and manufacture of defense and commercial electronics and systems including airborne radar systems, navigation systems, electronic warfare systems, precision weapons, air traffic control systems, air defense systems, communications systems, space systems, marine systems, oceanic and naval systems, logistics systems, and government systems


NO:32_2
路過的VOR  於 2003/01/08 10:54
Re:先進感測器專欄

>>>不要給我看到什麼舊東西

好恐怖 ^^

雖然說只要新東西,交給美國國會的報告
Navy Network-Centric Warfare Concept (PDF 檔)
應該可以拿來做為討論基礎之一,裡面簡略的講了些美國海軍最近的進展。
此篇在2002年十一月更新過。


NO:32_3
路過的VOR  於 2003/01/08 11:07
Re:先進感測器專欄

美國國防部的消息﹕
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov2002/b11212002_bt594-02.html
有人討論時提到文內這句
The USS Lake Erie, equipped with Aegis BMD computer programs and equipment,
developed a fire control solution without any external sensor inputs.

NO:32_4
flak  於 2003/01/08 11:50
Re:先進感測器專欄

>應該可以拿來做為討論基礎之一,裡面簡略的講了些美國海軍最近的進展。
這個題目太大,另開一欄處理
基本上,網基作戰主要還是架構在網路上,感測器只是一個附庸。另開先進網路專欄處理

NO:32_5
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/08 19:50
Re:先進感測器專欄

一擊必殺AEON環宇軍武網

加快軍事轉型和網路中心戰步伐,美國防部將加速研發先進隱形特殊寬頻電子攻擊天線和主動電子掃描陣列天線雷達
2003-01-07

  據美國《每日航宇》1月4日報導,為了加快軍事轉型和網路中心戰步伐,美國國防部將研發特殊寬頻帶電子攻擊天線和主動電子掃描陣列天線雷達,因為航空航太工業發展的小型、隱形、多功能天線能力對於美國防部電子攻擊和資訊戰計劃是至關重要的。
  
  由於國防部計劃將陳舊的電子干擾飛機諸如海軍的EA-6B“徘徊者”和空軍的EC-130“羅盤呼叫”退出現役,部分新軍事環境將在電子干擾方面有巨大的改變,所以,已不能夠適應新的高科技戰爭需要的電子防空雷達和戰場通信的絕大部分使命將由裝備了特殊寬頻帶電子攻擊天線和主動電子掃描陣列天線雷達的下一代飛機來完成。
  
  主動電子掃描陣列天線雷達是由數百、乃至上千的由各種不同的特定形式安裝組合在一起的收發器組成,它能夠同時搜索一個地區、跟蹤一個目標或干擾一個敵方雷達。該雷達可以安裝在F/A-22“猛禽”戰鬥機、F-35“聯合打擊戰鬥機”、F/A-18E/F“超級大黃蜂”、部分F-15戰鬥機、X-45和X-47無人駕駛戰鬥機、多感測器指揮與控制飛機(MC2A)、以及B-2A轟炸機上。透過網路,他們可以對一項分佈式的、高定向的干擾任務有所幫助。
  
  這種安裝了主動電子掃描陣列天線的飛機還將加裝高能微波或無線電頻率武器,這樣它就可以攻擊並使敵方電子設備失去作用。航空航太工業還將致力於研發可在防空地點附近投擲到地面的裝置,它可以間隔發射能量脈衝來干擾或導致接受器產生混亂而又不被輕易發現和摧毀。



NO:32_6
flak  於 2003/01/09 10:29
Re:先進感測器專欄

>加快軍事轉型和網路中心戰步伐,美國防部將加速研發先進隱形特殊寬頻電子攻擊天線和
>主動電子掃描陣列天線雷達
這裡的「軍事轉型」就是Transformation,「網路中心戰」就是NCW,前面翻做網基作戰。而文中提到的特殊EA天線與AESA天線,指得就是各軍發展中的AESA天線。

正當中國還在研究如何把激光、GPS與紅外線科技上到戰機上時,美國下一代的感測器主力已經轉到AESA。最主要的原因是AESA繼承傳統雷達的全天候特性,但由於它的頻寬大、波束控制性大,多工能力強,使它一方面可以特別的SAR、ISAR、精確測距方式強化傳統雷達缺乏的精確影像能力,另一方面又可以維持傳統雷達廣範圍掃瞄與分離移動目標的能力,而有能力成為一架多功能飛機的「唯一」多功能感測器。

AESA的歷史很早,但能夠如此大量應用卻是這幾年的事。主要的原因是飛機空間有限,所以早期的L波段AESA天線的尺寸太大。直到這幾年Ga-As半導體的發展使X波段AESA成為可能,才大量的被應用。

AESA神奇的地方尚不止於此,由於聚焦功率大,頻寬大的特性,使其也相當適合作為ESM或ECM的特性。所以不但可以取代傳統感測器,甚至可作為全電戰系統的一部份。

除了進行中的戰機計畫之外,目前最重要的計畫是MC2A。MC2A希望利用AESA的能力,能夠以一架飛機=現今E3+E8的能力,甚至要再超過。因為E3的問題是掃瞄能力受限於旋轉天線,而E8的問題是其被動陣列天線雖具有GMTI與SAR兩種功能,卻不能「同時」使用。美軍已經裝備了一架B707進行MC2A的科技驗證,並正在爭取B767實驗機的經費。這將統一目前對空預警機與對地預警機的市場。


NO:32_7
flak  於 2003/01/09 15:45
Re:先進感測器專欄

那網基作戰與AESA又有什麼關連性呢?
當然,感測器越先進,代表資料來源越好,就讓網路的功能更強,這跟Internet普及的原理是一樣的。然而,網基作戰也可能反過來提升AESA的能力。

為什麼呢?最明顯的例子是多基雷達的資料整合,當目標利用地形地物若隱若現時,多基雷達能夠交叉彌補雷達死角,保持追蹤。

但還有一個有趣的例子是下文中的AMSTE計畫,它利用多具AESA雷達追蹤移動目標,並以資料鍵導控GPS彈藥命中目標,有沒有想過為什麼非要「多具」AESA不可?那AESA作戰所需的支援也太累贅了吧?

原來AESA雖然功能強大,卻有一點是不足以自傲的:角度精確度。雖然AESA的波束精確度比傳統雷達來得高,但受限於波常,其真正的波束精確度仍然相當抱歉。如此一來,在幾十公里外的誤差可能會高達一百米以上。

有幾個方法可以解決,對傳統的雷達導引武器而言,由於不精確的原因是角度,隨著武器接近目標,雖然誤差角一樣,但誤差距離卻越來越小。而進行地形繪圖的雷達,可以用積分計算的SAR方式,提高對靜態目標的精確度。

偏偏現在要打的是移動目標,所以雷達必須是GMTI模式而不是SAR;而且為了省錢,彈藥上不能裝尋標器。所幸AESA的誤差角雖大,但測距精度卻很高,所以如果我們有多具AESA掛在網路上,同時提供「服務」去對同一個目標照射,利用類似三角定位的方式我們就可以得到更高的座標精確度,如此一來就可以使定位精確度達到GPS武器可以命中的水準。

從這裡衍生可以發現,能夠發射多波束、多功能的AESA天線,就好像是可以提供多使用者的伺服器一樣,則利用網路連接起來,就可以讓網路使用者同時利用多台伺服器的服務,則網路可以提供的「服務」就更千變萬化。
DARPA Demonstrates Affordable Moving Surface Target Engagement Using JDAM And JSOW Weapons

(Source: US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; issued Oct. 9, 2002)

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Affordable Moving Surface Target Engagement (AMSTE) has for the first time demonstrated the ability to perform multiple, simultaneous precision engagements of moving surface targets using modified Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM). DARPA also demonstrated for the first time the ability to engage a single moving target with a modified Joint Stand-Off Weapon (JSOW).

These precision-guided weapons were used very effectively against fixed targets in Operation Enduring Freedom. The techniques demonstrated will permit inventory weapons like the JDAM and JSOW to be employed in a new role to precisely engage moving surface threats.

On September 30, an F-14 launched the two AMSTE-configured, inert, 2000-pound JDAM weapons at two different targets within a convoy moving at 18 mph across the range at Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake, Calif. The two weapons were launched from 20,000 feet, at a range of approximately six nautical miles. The targets were tracked using two stand-off airborne ground moving target indicator (GMTI) radars, one a Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) radar and one a surrogate for a Joint Strike Fighter radar. The sensor data was networked between the two aircraft and fused in the AMSTE tracking software to provide continuous, precise geolocation updates on the designated targets.

Post-launch, each weapon was individually directed to its target using in-flight target update (IFTU) messages transmitted from the JSTARS. One of the weapons passed within feet of the target vehicle before impacting roughly five meters beyond the target; the other weapon miss distance was approximately 10 to 13 meters from the target.

Later the same day, an F/A-18 launched a single, AMSTE-configured JSOW weapon at a tank moving at roughly 15 mph in traffic with a convoy progressing in the opposite direction at 18 mph. Weapon-launch occurred at 30,000 feet and at a range of approximately 35 nautical miles. Once again the weapon was directed to the tank using multi-laterated GMTI radar and real-time IFTUs. The IFTUs were passed to the weapon using a standard Link-16 data link, demonstrating the ability to direct an AMSTE weapon using a standard Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) data link. The inert JSOW scored a direct hit on the moving tank, separating the turret from the main body of the tank.

“These flight tests continue to mature the AMSTE vision of enabling the network-centric stand-off precision engagement of moving targets,” explains Stephen Welby, Deputy Director of the DARPA Information Exploitation Office. “This week’s tests demonstrate the ability to support multiple, simultaneous engagements within the AMSTE concept. They show that the AMSTE concept is applicable to weapons with JDAM-like characteristics as well as long-range glide weapons like JSOW. And we’ve demonstrated this week the ability to provide AMSTE updates to a weapon in-flight using standard Link-16 data links. This ability to provide networked precision engagement of movers is a powerful transformational capability for U.S. warfighters.”

Additional AMSTE experiments are planned for late October at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., when the AMSTE team will evaluate approaches to support continuous tracking of multiple vehicles for extended durations in very complex motion scenarios. These tests will assess the ability of feature-aided tracking tools to support long-term track maintenance of high-value targets through the targeting cycle.

DARPA’s AMSTE program is developing a network-centric targeting approach that will couple standoff airborne radar sensors and low-cost weapons in a real-time engagement network.

Under the AMSTE approach, data from multiple airborne ground moving target indicator (GMTI) radar sensors are fused to provide weapons with real-time target position updates while in-flight. AMSTE will provide a new strike capability to engage moving surface threats from standoff ranges, in all weathers, using affordable precision-guided munitions.

The AMSTE program is funded by DARPA and managed by DARPA and the Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome, N.Y. Development of the AMSTE demonstration system was led by Northrop Grumman Integrated Systems Sector, Melbourne, Fla., with JDAM weapon subcontract support from Boeing Phantom Works, St Louis, Mo., and JSOW subcontract support from Raytheon, Tucson, Ariz. (ends)


NO:32_8
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/11 18:05
Re:先進感測器專欄

除了造價以外,AESA雷達在戰機實際應用上的問題在於:TR模組的能量轉換效率低於45%.因此當AESA天線上成百上千的TR模組一起發功時,伴隨而生的便是驚人的熱量,為了避免高貴的AESA天線淪為高級砷化鎵湯的下場,AESA雷達必須配備更強力的冷卻系統;而傳統戰機雷達所使用的氣冷式冷卻系統,其效能並不足以滿足AESA雷達需要,必須改由特製的液冷式冷卻系統出馬方能勝任.因此一架戰機能否順利安裝AESA雷達,有無充足的電力供應與冷卻將是先決條件,而這對升級空間先天有限的輕型戰機安裝AESA雷達上,可能會造成某種程度的困難與挑戰.

NO:32_9
Rusio  於 2003/01/11 19:19
Re:先進感測器專欄

不知道日本F-2戰機用的AESA雷達的問題解決沒有?

NO:32_10
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/11 23:42
Re:先進感測器專欄

依照防衛廳發言人去年的說法,這問題三五年內解決不了......

NO:32_11
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/12 13:51
Re:先進感測器專欄

AESA雷達的優勢:

1. 比機械掃描雷達快上成千上萬倍的波束敏捷度,能同時執行多項任務模式.

2. 極低的雷達旁波瓣+T/R模組的Thermal Noise只有傳統戰機雷達的1/2至1/4 --> 有效偵測距離與Sensitivity因而大幅提升.

3. 固定式天線陣列+數位化控制T/R模組能量運用+極高的波束敏捷度+極低的旁波瓣
--> 雷達低可視度以及雷達波束低被攔截率的匿蹤特性獲致.

4. 能量傳輸段是由成百上千的T/R模組而非如機械掃描/PESA雷達的單一行波管負責;傳統雷達只要行波管一壞即掛,而AESA雷達卻可承受約10%左右的T/R模組損毀仍不致於失能,抗戰損能力高出甚多.

5. 機械掃描/PESA雷達的單一行波管在運作時得承受極高的壓力電壓與電流,因此平均故障間隔時數只有60~300飛行小時左右,而AESA雷達的壓力電壓與電流由成百上千個T/R模組分攤,不易損毀,加上前述的抗戰損能力,其平均故障間隔時數至少在1000飛行小時以上;以每架軍機一年200飛行小時的日常飛行能量評估,則若其使用機械掃描/PESA雷達的話,每年得對戰機雷達進行一次至三次的進廠大修,換成使用AESA雷達的話,則大約五年一次即可,大幅減輕後勤維修負擔.

6. 能同時產生大量不同型式用途波束的本質 + 精益求精的軟體程式控制 --> 未來的發展潛力與用途無可限量.


NO:32_12
flak  於 2003/01/13 10:02
Re:先進感測器專欄

>雷達低可視度以及雷達波束低被攔截率的匿蹤特性獲致.
忘記提這件事。不管主動或被動陣列天線都有一個很大的優點就是固定天線,所以天線可以朝一個方向傾斜而有利於匿蹤。早期低空飛行的B1是朝下,現在高空戰機則流行朝上,再高級的就是B2貼合蒙皮的設計。
從這裡衍生,Rafale的匿蹤效果應該不會比EF-2000那個亂閃的Captor天線差才對。

NO:32_13
cobrachen  於 2003/01/13 11:40
Re:先進感測器專欄

幾個問題:

像是APY-2或是SPS-48這種平面陣列雷達,他們的陣列是線性陣列,所以在水平方位上發射出去的波形是?

SPS-48是重疊9道波束,是說這些波束同時打出去?

許多平面陣列天線在垂直方位上是以改變頻率的方式去改變波束的相位和指向,這主方式好像比較簡單也比較便宜,重量也比較輕?為什麼呢?

我目前只知道相位控制是可以同時在水平和垂直方位上同時進行相位變化而改變波束指向,那頻率改變的只能一個方位,原因呢?


NO:32_14
flak  於 2003/01/13 12:16
Re:先進感測器專欄

>SPS-48是重疊9道波束,是說這些波束同時打出去?
這個我也覺得有點怪,因為多波束一般應該是2又1/2D雷達用的,不會再上下掃瞄,而改利用波束間的差分來測量角度。SPS-48已經會上下掃瞄了,應該不需要才對。當然,SPS-48可能是兩種形式的複合,用多波束上下掃瞄,或者上下頻率掃瞄,但在水平面分佈多道波束。
>許多平面陣列天線在垂直方位上是以改變頻率的方式去改變波束的相位和指向,這主方式
>好像比較簡單也比較便宜,重量也比較輕?為什麼呢?
這方法應該不是比較簡單,只是比較「成熟」而已。原因我猜是調變頻率的晶體比能夠精確調變相位的晶體先出來,自然大家先作頻率掃瞄雷達囉。

最後,這些科技都太老舊啦,而且將會被全面汰換掉,所以我不想在這個專欄對這種老舊的科技有太多著墨。


NO:32_15
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/13 12:32
Re:先進感測器專欄

>雷達低可視度以及雷達波束低被攔截率的匿蹤特性獲致.
忘記提這件事。不管主動或被動陣列天線都有一個很大的優點就是固定天線,所以天線可以朝一個方向傾斜而有利於匿蹤。早期低空飛行的B1是朝下,現在高空戰機則流行朝上,再高級的就是B2貼合蒙皮的設計。
從這裡衍生,Rafale的匿蹤效果應該不會比EF-2000那個亂閃的Captor天線差才對。

a:

1. ........老英會告訴你,靠著被動偵搜系統與MIDS,Captor可以脖子歪一邊不幹事,然後EF-2000照樣是天下第二(在F-35正式出爐前)的低可視度戰機........

2. 再者,由於PESA的行波管與電子掃描天線間,較傳統機械掃瞄雷達與AESA雷達多出一種名為Ferrite的裝置,這種裝置能將來自行波管所傳送的單一微波分發至電子掃描天線的個各陣列之上,令PESA雷達得以具備高波束敏捷度與同時執行多重任務模式的能力,但是由於此裝置會耗損相當能量,因此會造成PESA雷達的有效偵測距離與Sensitivity 低於同功率級數的傳統機械掃瞄雷達和AESA雷達,從而間接抵消其匿蹤構型優勢.

例一:
裝置在MIG-31上的PESA雷達的大小重量(1000公斤以上)將近裝置在雄貓戰機上的AWG-9/AN/APG-71雷達(512公斤)的兩倍,但最大有效偵測距離卻遜於後者(200~300km v.s 240~370km)

例二:
Rafale和EF-2000是同級戰機,但RBE-2的空對空偵測距離(最大偵測距離:148km,對一般戰機大小目標:65至97km)同樣也明顯不及Captor(最大偵測距離:320至370km,對一般戰機大小目標:130至160km)


NO:32_16
flak  於 2003/01/13 13:42
Re:先進感測器專欄

>Captor可以脖子歪一邊不幹事,然後EF-2000照樣是天下第二(在F-35正式出爐前)的低可
>視度戰機........
Captor的模式是持續TWS,所以除非打死不用雷達,否則一定會轉來轉去。其次,就算它打定主意歪一邊,仍然無法完善遮住後方的結構,所以一定會有Leak。

所以Captor要匿蹤就不能用,就算不用,也還是沒有匿蹤。EF-2000還是把雷達拆掉,換個金屬雷達罩比較實際。


NO:32_17
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/18 12:11
Re:先進感測器專欄

http://richardb.coolfreepage.com/sectship.htm

選擇其下的45級防空驅逐艦專欄,便可以找到MESAR/SAMPSON主動陣列雷達的超詳盡介紹

SAMPSON雙面旋轉式主動陣列雷達

重量:4.6公噸

T/R單元數:
總計5,200個砷化鎵陣列單元,每單元的輸出功率可從2~20W不等,每一面雷達天線上有2,600個砷化鎵陣列單元,並分別由四條Channel所管轄,單面尖峰輸出功率可達25KW。

天線旋轉速率:60rpm

對空偵測距離:數百公里(另一種說法是荷蘭APAR多功能雷達的數倍)
(BAE集團聲稱:老實說,在使用本公司天下無雙的SAMPSON多功能雷達之後,45級防空驅逐艦根本沒有S1850M 3D長程對空搜索雷達的必要,之所以安裝之,完全是延續先前地平線計劃時代的”積習”所至........)

防空作戰能力:

1. 同步追蹤(Track):約2000個空中目標

2. 同時接戰(Engagement):數十個空中目標
(BAE集團聲稱:相形之下,傳統防空火控雷達一次至多只能接戰三個目標)

3. 同時指揮導引16枚(一說可高達32枚)ASTER-15/30防空飛彈,同步接戰12個(一說可達16個)空中目標,一旦鎖定目標,數秒內首發ASTER飛彈便可自發射管內昇空迎擊,並可在十秒鍾內接連射出八發。


NO:32_18
cobrachen  於 2003/01/22 11:47
Re:先進感測器專欄

>最後,這些科技都太老舊啦,而且將會被全面汰換掉,

你的意思是說以改變頻率來改變波束方向的科技太老舊,還是說連相位改變的都太老舊?那麼新的技術是什麼?還是說你的意思是被動或是堆疊波束的技術太老舊,未來是主動的天下?

你前面提到即使是主動天線的角度測量的精度還是有限制,那麼除了多個天線之外,以什麼其他潛在的解決方式?像是使用更小的元件以達到單位面積有更多的TR單元呢?


NO:32_19
flak  於 2003/01/22 12:06
Re:先進感測器專欄

>你的意思是說以改變頻率來改變波束方向的科技太老舊,還是說連相位改變的都太老舊?
運用頻率的方法。被動的相位雷達也是有點老,不過主動陣列還沒便宜到可以把它淘汰的地步。
>那麼除了多個天線之外,以什麼其他潛在的解決方式?像是使用更小的元件以達到單位面
>積有更多的TR單元呢?
應該是沒有用的,因為這是頻率的問題。最好的方法應該還是用多波束去壓榨解析度。

NO:32_20
cobrachen  於 2003/01/22 12:11
Re:先進感測器專欄

>不過主動陣列還沒便宜到可以把它淘汰的地步。

但是以主動原件這幾年的成本的變化,以及被動的實際上對功率的要求更高,妥善率相對會降低以及冷卻也是個問題來看,主動迅速取代的機會逐漸成長。歐洲那幾款單面的陣列幾乎都是主動的,不是嗎?

>最好的方法應該還是用多波束去壓榨解析度。

不同位置的天線的多波束還是同一個天線不同區域發出的多波束?


NO:32_21
flak  於 2003/01/22 12:36
Re:先進感測器專欄

>歐洲那幾款單面的陣列幾乎都是主動的,不是嗎?
法義的Aster艦上雷達都是被動的。英國的好像才是主動的。
另外德荷的是主動雷達。
因為一艘戰艦服役可能會達30年,所以我們應該還要看法義的被動雷達好一陣子。
不過,法義的被動雷達仍然是一個突破,因為它的波束雖然只有一道,但仍然可以自由運動,仍然大幅克服了過去頻率掃瞄無法彈性改變的缺點。加上艦上空間比較大,不若空載對重量大小有嚴格需求,所以在地面與海面的市場上,被動雷達在可見的未來還不會退出市場。
>不同位置的天線的多波束還是同一個天線不同區域發出的多波束?
都可以。不同位置的方法是靠撐大孔徑來壓榨解析度,同一天線則可能還是得靠延長時間來壓榨解析度。

NO:32_22
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/22 13:17
Re:先進感測器專欄

現今西方世界海軍的新銳MFR雷達:

主動式:

美國:AN/SPY-2,AN/SPY-3

英國:MESAR/SAMPSON

荷蘭:APAR

澳洲:CEA


被動式:

美利堅:AN/SPY-1家族

義大利:EMPAR

法蘭西:Arabel


NO:32_23
吱吱鼠  於 2003/01/22 15:50
Re:先進感測器專欄

有個問題我一直忘了問。
MESAR/SAMPSON號稱可在大約一百公里處偵測到RCS0.008平方米的目標嗎???
可是MESAR/SAMPSON是E/F波段的,解析度理論上不是比X波的APAR差才對啊。
怎麼會MESAR/SAMPSON反而比較強,莫非是另有原因???


NO:32_24
吱吱鼠  於 2003/01/22 15:52
Re:先進感測器專欄

前面打錯了。
應該是為什麼MESAR/SAMPSON作得到而APAR做不到。

NO:32_25
flak  於 2003/01/22 15:54
Re:先進感測器專欄

>應該是為什麼MESAR/SAMPSON作得到而APAR做不到。
這很正常,波長越長,大氣的衰減越小,所以偵測距離本來就比較遠。
但解析度較低,天線的重量尺寸也較大

NO:32_26
吱吱鼠  於 2003/01/22 16:13
Re:先進感測器專欄

謝謝flak大師。
那這是不是也意味著MESAR/SAMPSON,在使用半主動飛彈時還要多加幾具X波的照明雷達。


NO:32_27
flak  於 2003/01/22 16:24
Re:先進感測器專欄

>那這是不是也意味著MESAR/SAMPSON,在使用半主動飛彈時還要多加幾具X波的照明雷達。
當然,這就是為什麼神盾艦長這個樣子

NO:32_28
cobrachen  於 2003/01/23 07:12
Re:先進感測器專欄

一個問題,從來沒在資料上看過:

以主動天線來說,一般來講需要多少個元件才能夠成一個有效的波束?不可能是一個,功率太小,那有沒有基本最低要求呢?還是就是看功率需求去臨時組合?


NO:32_29
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/23 07:52
Re:先進感測器專欄

那這是不是也意味著MESAR/SAMPSON,在使用半主動飛彈時還要多加幾具X波的照明雷達

SAMPSON is designed to be interoperable with a range of weapon systems. Within PAAMS, it will work in association with the Aster active radar guided missile family, for which it will provide target designation and E/F-band mid-course guidance uplink.

Within the BAE Systems-proposed SIWS (SAMPSON Integrated Weapon System), the radar system would work with the US family of semi-active radar guided missiles (notably Standard Missile SM-2 Block IIIA and ESSM).

In SIWS, the required I/J-band interrupted continuous wave illumination (ICWI) of targets and missile uplink would be provided by typically two seperate CEA-Mount active phase array tracking radars developed joint by BAE Systems and Australian company CEA Technologies. SIWS was being offered for the now cancelled Royal Australian Navy ANZAC-class warfighting improvement program (WIP) and is now being promoted primarily in South Korea (KDX-3 program) and Turkey (TF-2000 program).


NO:32_30
flak  於 2003/01/23 09:54
Re:先進感測器專欄

>以主動天線來說,一般來講需要多少個元件才能夠成一個有效的波束?
不曉得
>那這是不是也意味著MESAR/SAMPSON,在使用半主動飛彈時還要多加幾具X波的照明雷達
當然,像APAR導引標準二就不用照明雷達

NO:32_31
HOTARU  於 2003/01/24 01:06
Re:先進感測器專欄

日本海自的實驗艦裝的FCS-3 AESA雷達要正式用在新的DDH上了,不過這個正式實戰版
要加入有趣的改良,他們要把開發F-2雷達的技術拿來用,一面天線上同時有C波段跟X
波段單元。C波段遠距搜索,X波段追蹤掃描兼照明。連老美都是同時開發SPY2跟SPY3
兩種雷達來分工負責搜索與照明,日本居然想一次解決?不知道會不會又出問題?

NO:32_32
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/01/24 02:29
Re:先進感測器專欄

嗯......德國在前年提出的2020未來水面作戰艦艇家族計畫構想中,也有此類一次解決的構想設計,只是一次解決的範圍更大,不只遠距搜索與追蹤掃描兼照明雷達合一,連通訊電戰資料鏈訊息傳遞等各式天線功能也全部結合在內........這種將所有雷達天線功能都集成在一具含有各式大小孔徑功能主動陣列天線的AESA天線集成”塔”內的好處是能大幅節省船上以往被五花八門各式雷達天線所佔領的空間以供他用(是以該計畫構想中滿載排水量六千餘噸級的防空巡防艦構型,整體武裝火力攜行量絲毫不亞於今日滿載排水量將近萬噸級的老美新銳神盾驅逐艦:伯克IIA.......),但缺點則在於終究難以擺脫把所有雞蛋放在一籃裡之顧慮.

NO:32_33
acetw  於 2003/02/25 00:03
Re:先進感測器專欄

最近在研究一種很奇怪的雷達,不知道有沒有人有進一步的情報…

Thompson-CSF在做一種我稱之為”半主動電子掃瞄陣列”,名稱叫Heracles(應該就是英文的Hercules)。AESA基本上是欲小不易的東西,因為它會製造大量廢熱,必須要有冷卻系統(好像還得要是液冷的?!我說錯請糾正我)。那麼小不好做,大會有什麼壞處呢?愈大就意味著波束愈寬,抗干擾、抗雜波的能力愈低。Heracles是什麼呢?說穿了就是在AESA前增加了移相器來作beamforming,各位可以想像AESA前加了一個”電磁透鏡”來使雷達波束”聚焦”和”指向”。它保有AESA的優點,比方說它有16個單元,一次可以打出四道波束,不過缺點是AESA和移相器之間要保持一段距離,所以它會很大,要裝上船只能裝一台,邊旋轉邊掃瞄…


NO:32_35
flak  於 2003/02/25 09:47
Re:先進感測器專欄

>各位可以想像AESA前加了一個”電磁透鏡”來使雷達波束”聚焦”和”指向”。
這種東西以前AW&st;就有報導過,算是一種變形,並沒有流行。

NO:32_36
flak  於 2003/02/25 23:51
Re:先進感測器專欄

澳洲向來是OTH的愛好者
Border Surveillance Boosted With New Radar

(Source: Australian Defence Organisation; issued Feb. 25, 2003)


Defence and Customs Coastwatch will be better equipped to monitor Australias northern coastline following the signing of a contract to trial a new over-the-horizon high frequency surface wave radar, Defence Minister Robert Hill and Justice and Customs Minister Chris Ellison said today.

Defence and Daronmont Technologies signed a three-year $15 million contract yesterday for the provision, operation and support of the radar, known as SECAR.

On conclusion of Government negotiations for access to appropriate indigenous land, the radar system will be deployed in northern Australia.

The radar can detect surface vessels and low-flying aircraft beyond the visible horizon, unlike conventional radars which are limited in operation to line-of-sight.

The technology will allow 24-hour wide area coast surveillance, enabling authorities to better protect Australias fisheries resources and our offshore oil and gas assets and to deter smugglers and illegal entrants. The monitoring will also help with search and rescue operations and early storm warning.

The trial will allow authorities to test and evaluate the future surveillance potential of the radar, using it to complement other surveillance assets and systems.

The project is a joint venture between Customs Coastwatch and the Department of Defence and will be managed from the Defence Materiel Organisation.

Daronmont Technologies is a wholly Australian owned small/medium enterprise that specialises in design, engineering, integration and support of complex high technology electronics and software-intensive systems, with facilities in Technology Park in South Australia, Williamtown in New South Wales and Burwood in Victoria.


NO:32_37
acetw  於 2003/03/03 01:36
Re:先進感測器專欄

http://military.china.com/zh_cn/arming/11003670/20030219/11414784.html

楔尾預警机新天線進入試驗
2003-02-19 08:37:18 中國航空信息网

  据英國《防務數据》2003年2月12日報道,諾斯羅普榆瞉|門公司已完成第一部
生產型多用途電子掃描陣列(MESA)雷達天線系統的初型試驗,該型雷達天線是專為
澳大利亞防空部隊的“楔尾”空中預警和控制(AEW&C;)飛机設計生產的。諾榆璊膝q將
對此雷達天線進行為期14個月的結构疲勞試驗,目前已完成初型試驗。
  
  諾榆璊膝q提供的MESA天線由超輕型材料制成,安裝在飛机机身后部頂端,具有
在不用机械式轉動雷達拋物面反射體就能提供360陘閬鴘滷蓬y能力。MESA可應用于
多种監視用途,利用脈沖多普勒雷達模式進行空中搜索,脈沖方式進行海上搜索。
此外,還可用于軍机和民机的敵我識別。
  
  預計第一架裝備MESA雷達天線的波音737-700將于2004年第二季度首飛。 (張晉
平 洪山)


NO:32_38
flak  於 2003/03/04 10:15
Re:先進感測器專欄

美國的MC2A計畫得到了一個正式編號:E-10A,同時也是這群不知道幾年級的美軍終於回復正常的飛機編號規則(但當大家都不照規矩時,照規矩的反而變成怪腳)
Air Force Designates New Aircraft

(Source: US Air Force; issued Feb. 28, 2003)


HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, Mass. --- The Air Force recently designated its new multisensor command and control aircraft the E-10A.

The E designation stands for electrical systems. While the E is specific to the mission of the aircraft, 10 was used simply because it is next in the inventory sequence. The A stands for the first variation of the aircraft.

The Electronic Systems Center here is managing the acquisition and development of the E-10A. Hanscom is also the birthplace of three other Air Force aircraft that share the E designation -- the E-3B Sentry airborne warning and control system aircraft, the E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System and the E-4B, which serves as the National Airborne Operations Center for the president and secretary of defense.

There was talk about creating an M prefix for multisensor, said Col. Joseph Smyth, multisensor command and control aircraft system program director, but it was decided to go with the E designation instead.

The Air Force Program Integration Division at the Pentagon recently approved the designation.

The E-10 multisensor command and control aircraft will provide ground- and some airborne-moving target indication, as well as key battle management command and control. It is expected to be a central element in the Air Forces Command and Control Constellation.

The C2 Constellation is a concept that envisions a fully connected array of land-, platform- and space-based sensors that use common standards and communication protocols to relay information automatically in machine-to-machine interfaces.

Architectural development, system engineering and integration of the Constellation are also being managed here.


NO:32_39
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/03/09 12:32
Re:先進感測器專欄

http://tw.club.yahoo.com/clubs/J10--AEON--ARMY

美國空軍最近命名它的新型多感測器指揮與控制飛機為E-10A


 據英國《防衛新聞》網站2003年3月3日報導,美國空軍最近命名它的新型多感測器指揮與控制飛機為E-10A。

E命名代表電子系統。E是對飛機的任務進行分類,而10的運用就比較簡單,因為它是美空軍財產清冊順序中的下一個機種。A代表該機的第一個改良型。

Hanscom空軍基地的電子系統中心負責管理E-10A的採購和開發事務。

多感測器指揮與控制飛機計劃主管Joseph Smyth上校說:曾討論過創建一個前綴M表示多感測器之意。但是,最後決定用E命名代替。

E-10A多感測器指揮與控制飛機將用來提供地面和某些空中活動目標指示,以及重要戰役管理、指揮和控制。預計,它將成為空軍指揮與控制星座群中的中心單元。

C2星座群是一種概念,該概念設想為一個陸地平臺感測器和天基感測器全連接陣列,這些感測器採用通用標準和通訊協議,以便在機器-機器介面間自動中繼資訊。星座群的結構開發、系統工程和綜合也由Hanscom空軍基地的電子系統中心負責管理。


NO:32_40
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/04/03 15:19
Re:先進感測器專欄

瑞典JAS-39 AESA雷達換裝計劃的最新發展:

A. ERICSSON集團將其AESA雷達開發計劃定名為NORA計劃,意思是”Not Only A Radar”

B. ERICSSON集團預定在2004年使該計劃進入飛行展示階段,並於2010年起開始換裝於JAS-
39戰機之上,並於2013年達到全面功能開發與整合。

C. 根據ERICSSON集團聲稱,NORA雷達是一種機械/主動電子掃描混合式的雷達,主動電子天線陣列被安裝在一個左右單一軸向擺動的機械掃描雷達平台,使其擁有高達200度的雷達搜索角,因此即使目標位於JAS-39的後半球,換裝NORA雷達的JAS-39不用轉向也照樣能追蹤鎖定之,還能達到一邊往側後方敵機扔流星級長程衝壓彈,一邊轉向加速逃離敵機飛彈有效攔截範圍此等BVR空戰無上王道境界。

D. NORA雷達的其他優點:
#更強大的長程搜索追蹤能力(超大搜索角+探測距離增加+先進波束控制+超低旁波瓣)
#空對空/多重任務多目標接戰能力強化以及匿蹤目標探測能力強化。
#具備主動搜索與匿蹤式被動偵蒐兩種搜索追蹤模式以及低被攔截概率,大幅強化戰機匿蹤性。
#高度彈性的主/被動目標search模式能有效強化SA以及information superiority。
#在偵查或精確打擊作戰時能提供超高解析度的即時合成孔徑雷達地形圖以及移動目標指示。
#使用速度更快,更為寬頻以及抗干擾力更強的網路資料鏈,使JAS-39原本已經十分可怖的資料鏈網路戰力更加無比強大,配合上bistatic或是多機三角定位法戰術,不但能提昇偵測距離,提高定位精度,更能用於偵測攔截敵方的匿蹤戰機之上。
#除了雷達的功能之外,拜其被動模式之賜,其也同時是一款功能極為強大的ECM以及ESM。

E. 除了NORA雷達外,JAS-39也預定於2010年後以MIDAS整合式電戰防護套件取代現役的EWS-39電戰套件,MIDAS整合式電戰防護套件同樣以平板式主動陣列天線為組成核心,預警範圍以及威脅標定精度和處理能力皆遠優於現役預警系統,且能在收集並精確分析電磁訊號後,迅速對威脅來源雷達施以強力電磁干擾壓制﹔ERICSSON集團聲稱,在換裝MIDAS之後,JAS-39的電磁戰力將絕不下於任何一種現今專業SEAD戰機,且當這些專業SEAD戰機是得在大包小包的猛掛三至五個電戰艙夾之後方能獲得足夠電磁防護戰力時,JAS-39上的MIDAS整合式電戰防護套件卻是整合在機體內,因此可空出更多的掛架來掛載反輻射飛彈執行SEAD任務。


NO:32_41
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/04/11 01:19
Re:先進感測器專欄

http://www.defense-aerospace.com

BAE Systems To Revolutionise Electronic Warfare For Darpas Wolfpack Programme

(Source: BAE Systems; issued Apr. 9, 2003)


The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has selected BAE Systems to develop miniaturized, unattended ground sensors capable of detecting, identifying and jamming communications and radar threat signals for the WolfPack program.

The Wolfpack program will provide technologies that help the armed forces monitor and disrupt enemy communications and radar signals, while protecting friendly communications.

BAE Systems Information & Electronic Warfare Systems (IEWS), Nashua, New Hampshire, received a two-year, $22.8 million award from DARPAs Advanced Technology Office on March 25.

Aaron Penkacik, vice president of IEWS Advanced Systems and Technology organisation, said, This critical future capability is important to the military. It is likely to change the way our forces prosecute electronic warfare missions such as surveillance and electronic countermeasures.

Wolfpack consists of small, unattended sensors that can be placed at areas of interest by a variety of methods. Once deployed, individual wolves (sensors), self-organize into packs to determine optimum detection and jamming strategies. In each pack, gateway nodes provide data to users, and the system can detect and jam many threat signals.

Wolfpack will use BAE Systems Signal Intelligence Diamond Software Architecture and will be interoperable with the Adaptive Joint C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, and Computer, Intelligence and Reconnaissance) program, which IEWS is also developing for DARPA.

Wolfpack team members include BAE Systems Integrated Defense Solutions, Austin, Texas; M/A-COM, Lowell, Massachusetts; Herrick Technology Laboratories, Bedford, New Hampshire; Telcordia Technologies, Morristown, New Jersey; and ILC Dover Inc., of Frederica, Delaware.


NO:32_42
flak  於 2003/05/08 16:22
Re:先進感測器專欄

http://www.jedonline.com/default.asp?journalid=4&func;=articles&page;=0305j14&year;=2003&month;=5&doct;=features&rsno;=2
Backboards of the Fleet: Shipboard Phased-Array Radars

NO:32_43
小毛  於 2003/05/08 19:00
Re:先進感測器專欄

To flak
>Backboards of the Fleet: Shipboard Phased-Array Radars

好像要密碼才能閱讀.....殘念...


NO:32_44
flak  於 2003/05/08 20:22
Re:先進感測器專欄

>好像要密碼才能閱讀.....殘念...
#$%#$%....第二次回答:註冊不用錢,請大家不要那麼懶

NO:32_45
小毛  於 2003/05/08 22:09
Re:先進感測器專欄

#$%#$%....第二次回答:註冊不用錢,請大家不要那麼懶

收到,了解.


NO:32_46
flak  於 2003/05/09 15:30
四千瓦的超大雷射筆

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/data/communiques/data/2003May15671/index.htm
Northrop Wins Contract For Illuminator Laser

照明雷射是用在ABL計畫上,在發射波動砲之前,先照射目標以測量大氣狀況與距離,調整波動砲的超曲面合金反射器以得到最佳化形狀。


NO:32_47
VOR  於 2003/05/10 17:20
Re:先進感測器專欄

http://www.janes.com/defence/air_forces/news/jdw/jdw030509_1_n.shtml
USAFs SensorCraft takes shape
By Michael Sirak, JDW Staff Reporter, Washington DC

In the world of aircraft design, just about everything looks good on paper. However, the real viability of a design can only be known for certain when drawing board and computer animation give way to the reality of tooling shop and factory floor.

The US Air Force (USAF) is poised to make this critical transition with one of its most ambitious next-generation projects - the SensorCraft. Over the next several years, the service intends to launch the first series of advanced technology demonstrations that it says will usher in a new paradigm in aircraft design.

The SensorCraft is a technology portfolio of advanced sensors, communications links, air vehicle components and propulsion elements that the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) is pursuing with an eye to fielding a highly capable unmanned surveillance platform. Carrying a fully integrated mix of radar, cameras, electronic listening equipment and datalinks, it would loiter for extended periods above future battlefields at altitudes of up to 65,000ft. There it would collect fire-control-quality targeting data and pass this in real time as part of a system-of-systems network to counter time-critical targets like ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and fleeting vehicles (Janes Defence Weekly 9 October 2002).

The AFRLs goal is to develop the technologies so that the USAF can launch an aircraft programme between 2009 and 2013, if desired, with the goal of fielding the system as early as 2017.

Under the new design paradigm, laboratory officials say they are taking a sensor-centric approach to the programme, with engineers first formulating the optimal mix of sensors and then moulding an air vehicle around them, embedding items like radar apertures in the wings and fuselage. This, officials say, will avoid the legacy of weight penalties and parasitic drag caused when sensors are mated with platforms after engineers have completed the design of an aircraft.

Officials in the Sensors Directorate originally envisioned the SensorCraft air vehicle as a diamond-shaped configuration to maximise apertures and allow for easy 360° sensor coverage. However, the AFRL is now exploring several options as engineers from the laboratorys Air Vehicles and Propulsion Directorates begin to influence the design. The most radical option, Johnson said, would be a flying swept-wing design resembling a B-2 stealth bomber that would have apertures embedded that looked forward and aft of the wing [and] in the left and right hand sides giving the same 360° coverage.

The largest variant is a glider-like design similar to the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft that is optimised for a mission duration of between 50h and 60h. This concept has a 200ft wingspan, a weight of around 100,000lb and a payload largely taken up by long-endurance fuel tanks.


NO:32_48
Golden L't Foot  於 2003/05/23 19:35
Re:先進感測器專欄

雷達界的尼奧救世主革命三部曲:
1. 被動式相位陣列雷達(PESA)之滄海神盾戰記
2. 主動式相位陣列雷達(AESA)之天地猛禽傳說
3. 電漿天線陣列雷達(GPESA)之............

Gas Plasma Antenna Tech Could Revolutionize Radar Designs

(Source: Markland Technologies; issued May 22, 2003)


RIDGEFIELD, Conn. --- Markland Technologies, Inc., said ongoing US government funded research efforts led by its team of top plasma physicists has the potential to revolutionize radar design concepts employed by the military.

To date research has demonstrated that this new antenna design concept offers unique advantages over traditional metal antennas, which hereto fore have not been found elsewhere in radar antenna design. These unique, demonstrated benefits of a gas plasma antenna make it very attractive in military applications such as: Naval Surface Ship and Submarine Radar, Stealth Aircraft Radar and Ballistic Missile Defense Radar Antennas.

These advantages include:

--Stealth - When de-ionized, a plasma antenna will not backscatter radar waves nor will it absorb high power microwave radiation, which reduces the effects of electronic warfare counter measures.

--Flexibility for numerous signal types - Dynamically re-configurable characteristics such as bandwidth, frequency, gain and directivity.

--Portability for remote deployments - Much more compact and lightweight designs than those offered by conventional antenna designs.

--Greater Efficiency - Significantly reduces ringing effects, which allow for improvements in short pulse radar performance.

Traditional radar antenna design in its most common form employs a conducting metal surface that is sized to emit radiation at one or more selected frequencies. A plasma antenna design employs ionized gas, which is contained within an enclosure. When the gas is electrically charged or ionized to a plasma state it becomes conductive allowing radio frequency signals to be transmitted or received.

To date research has been funded by all three US Military Services and is ongoing. The company believes that its plasma antenna technology will give the military expanded capabilities.


回論壇 以下表格僅供管理人員整理資料輸入之用

資料輸入ID
資料輸入密碼
請依文章內容欄寬度斷行(按Enter鍵)以免破行.THANKS~~
署名: [♂♀]: HTML語法只提供字體變化與URL連結
回應主旨:
回應內容:
× ÷ ¥ £
引述舉例:欲連結本版第123題編號123_5的發言
<a; href=http://taiwantp.net/cgi/roadbbs.pl?board_id=8&type;=show_post&post;=123_5>123;_5</a>

語法按鈕使用後請收尾→→→
使用IE,文章不慎消失時,請立即在打字區內按滑鼠右鍵選[復原]。