第二點及第三點不需要在一個中國前提下，中國就可以做!!! 問題是他根本不會做這些事情。那請問我們何必傻傻的先用一中之狗鍊把自己綁起來，然後汪汪狂吠，面目可憎?

>難道您所領導的民進黨沒有信心有朝一日能成爲大中國的執政黨嗎？
Unless the CCP is willing to give up the power and change the constitution, not even mention 民進黨, NOBODYELSE can become 執政黨 in China.

>>2、作爲黨對黨談判的條件，
--> Basically its wrong to have DPP(民進黨) and CCP(中國共產黨) held talk. Why? Becasue unlike CCP, in Taiwan a polical party isnt equal to goverment, nor is it equal to the country (as in all demoncratic countries)

If there is 談判, it should goverment vs. goverment.

>1、根據《中華民國憲法》，“一個中國”根本就不是問題。先用“一個中國”來堵住共產黨的嘴巴，接著您就可以開出您的條件：
I thought CCP says 中華民國 does not exist anymore, right?

>大陸必須允許民進黨到大陸設立黨組織，發展黨員，
Why just DPP? Wouldnt it be better to allow anyone to form a polical party?

>同時大陸中央電視臺讓出一個頻道給民進黨以宣傳黨綱、施政方針、政策。
Agian, why just one channel? Why not allow everyone to express his/her opinon freely? Even better, why not open up the mass media?

>我敢保證，不出十年，您所領導的民進党完全有可能成爲大中國的第一大黨；
How about the Chinese military establishment? Will they allow this to happen?

By having CCP written into consitution to control the goverment and the military, there is no room for real democracy to develop.

>3、作爲兩岸統一的條件，大陸鄉鎮一級的直選不遲於2005年，縣一級的直選不遲於2010年，省一級的直選不遲於2015年，全國性的大選不遲於2020年。
An obvious question: why do you have to wait for DPP to do this? You could have asked (I should say DEMAND) the CCP to do this immedaitely!

>您所領導的民進党有成功扳倒國民黨的經驗，當然有一天您也完全可以扳倒共產黨。
Will CCP allow this to happen?

>如果您的方針政策、施政綱領，在我看來，能夠有利於國家，有利於民族，有利於人民的話，到時，我一定投您的票
Democracy is more than just 投票! Without a unbiased and open media, a open judicial system, and a neutral military, it will not work. It took Taiwan a long time to achieve what we have today, and there are many things we would like to improve.

You could start working toward democracy by DEMANDING the CCP to give up the power!

>一邊一國
Well, one side is PRC and the other side is ROC.

>讓大陸人可以親自到臺灣走走，感受一下臺灣的民主自由，大陸人自已也會反思自己所走過的路
You got the keyword here: 反思. Unfortunately, most of the mainland Chinese I met here dont do this even they are living in the US and enjoying what a 民主自由 country has to offer.

>面對越來越多的“台獨”的小動作和奇談怪論
You see this one aspect of having democracy. Sometime you will not like what you hear, but you put them in jail simply you disagree with what they said.

And if you really undersatnd 民主自由, you should also realized that is the people who will make the final decision. Its not him along.

>也將會是越來越重的歷史駡名
I always wonder why nobody from China critize CCP this way? How many people were killed by CCP? How about Cultural Revolution? It can not be just a fault of 4 people, right? 反思! 反思!

Again, you could start working toward democracy and 中華民族的偉大復興 by DEMANDING the CCP to give up the power!

目前看來，台灣的選舉制度發展的比中國快，也比較完整，請您敦促您的共產黨，先來台灣實習一下，先看看能不能跟台灣政府談談，讓你們也來參加個選舉（一個台灣原則下），設個黨部，練習選選台灣的議員，立委，我想如果要台灣政府答應的速度應會比你們慢慢改來得快，先實習一下，等到共產黨能在台灣拿到選票後，有個立委後，再來擔心2020年的事。
如果您還是偏好讓民進黨到中國去發展，照您說的，在中華民國憲法下，這不是問題，因為台灣目前的制度不是做到死才下台，所以陳水扁就算連任，頂多幹到2008年，你這麼急著呼籲他，到時他真的在屆任前喊喊一個中國，在任滿後，又去中國發展，被選成了你們國家的領導人，可是台灣這時又不是他執政，也不見得要理他，那你兩頭都落空，豈不虧大了？
另外，你死我活從頭到尾都是你講的，我始終是只管自己死活，至於你的死或活，抱歉，在下無能，無權也無力干涉。我從沒說過要打中國，那這樣好了，一邊一國，誰也別打誰，兄弟分家，也就沒誰贏誰輸了！！！

看完下邊兒補充參考資料，想想中國人有這個勇氣嗎？再來談民主進程:

從主宰人民到人民作主
From mastering people to people as masters

不支持台獨 == 統派 and 模糊台獨定 是這些政客慣用的手法,
事實上很多人的還是維持現況較佳(非統非獨)