http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2002/12477.htm 美國國務院新聞稿

又見統霉 欺騙抹黑的爛招數

東森的莊大記者 自己想像美國政府因阿扁的談話
說 一邊一國／分析／強調台灣屬於中國　美方緊縮對台政策
可是我實際上去看美國國務院公佈的新聞稿
根本就是統霉記者或China 記者提出的問題
這種 要誤導人民錯誤訊息的居心 真令人不恥
另外還有請個位網友幫一下 看可不可以找到那個提問人
假如是個台灣記者的話 一定要讓大家知道他們的醜陋面目
一直設陷阱要抹黑 誤導美國國務院 看會不會得到一個讓牠們爽的答案

新聞稿 關於台灣的部分

Daily Press Briefing
Philip T. Reeker, Deputy Spokesman
Washington, DC
August 5, 2002

........................................................ 略

QUESTION: My question is regarding Taiwanese President Chens remarks about each side is a
country and considered important and the urgency of passing legislation on a referendum.
I would like to know, at such a very moment right now that US Government is paying full
attention on fighting anti-terrorism and has so many domestic affairs,
that there might be some agitated intention between the two sides of the straits
because of Chens speech. So will the Bush Administration reckon President Chen as
a troublemaker or consider him as testing the bottom line of US Government,
or even he is abusing the goodwill from the Bush Administration?

評: 見縫差針妓者先想把陳總統抹黑成Trouble maker
順便挑撥 阿扁和Bush 政府的關係

MR. REEKER: I think perhaps the White House already responded in some ways to the broad sweep
of your question. But as you know, the United States policy, which is a longstanding one,
is a One China policy, and our policy has not changed at all.
We believe that issues between China and the Peoples Republic of China are matters to be
resolved by the people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
Our interest and concern is that any resolution be peaceful, and that policy has not changed
at all.

Yes, sir.

評: 重申一中及和平解決的政策
........................................................ 略

QUESTION: Can I go back to Taiwan?

評: 不死心

MR. REEKER: Sure.

QUESTION: The statement from Taiwan has caused some very strong reactions in the mainland.
And has the State Department or any of the agencies in the administration done anything to
persuade or discourage each side to tone down their rhetoric?

評: 想看看能不能套到美國行政部門的反彈的話

MR. REEKER: I think our position is quite clear. I repeated it just a moment ago in response
to your colleagues question: we have a One China policy.
Nothing has changed in that regard at all.

評: 美國不理牠 繼續前面所說的

QUESTION: On another subject --

QUESTION: Can I have a follow up? Well, not really a follow up, but also on China.
The Foreign Ministry has called the Minister in the US Embassy in Beijing expressing the
-- well, theyre not very happy with the fiscal year 2002, the supplementary
appropriation bill that linked Taiwanese military personnel as those from NATO,
from allied countries, things like that.

關於台灣是美國盟國的問題

MR. REEKER: I am not really sure of the characterizations youre making, and I am not aware
of that particular phone call. I dont think I have anything new in that regard.
The supplemental bill was passed some time ago.

QUESTION: Did President Jiang give the US Government an alert ahead before he gave his speech?

MR. REEKER: I am not aware of anything in that regard. Our policy is quite clear:
we have a One China policy. Nothing has changed in that regard. Okay?
Anybody want me to say that again?

Yes, sir.

QUESTION : Phil, you know the US policy, of course, is One China, and also the observance of
the three communiqu廥. People call it theology, you know, given the fact the Taiwanese
President, not only President Chen but his predecessor President Lee,
have repeatedly said, you know, Taiwan and China are two states.
So this is very contrary to the United States One China policy.
Dont you think, in the light of that, that One China policy is kind of becoming threadbare?

評: 這就是那位妓者說回到三公報的緊縮了 可是 這是記者提問的問題耶 而且Peeker 根本就不鳥他的前述

MR. REEKER: No. Now, Barry had a question

........................................................ 略

QUESTION: According to your understanding, there is one Taiwanese high level official is
coming towards Washington, DC, and her name is Ying-wen Tsai and that she is ready to
give Washington, D.C., her explanation about the background of President Chens speech.
Do you think it would be --

蔡英文的消息

MR. REEKER: I am not aware of it, so it is something Id have to check into to.
I dont know anything about it.

Thanks.

(The briefing was concluded at 2:20 p.m.)

東森原文
一邊一國／分析／強調台灣屬於中國　美方緊縮對台政策 2002/08/06 10:35

　記者莊雨琳／分析報導

美方官員5日在華府對外說明有關美國台海政策時，強調「美方態度認為，台海兩岸所有中國人都認知只有一個中國，台灣是中國的一部份。」由於上述有關一中認知的內容，是美中上海公報的具體文字陳述，相較於近來北京當局所強調的三段論中，兩岸同屬一個中國的論調，對台灣而言，上海公報反而比三段論還嚴苛，這也顯示美方對一邊一國態度的消極看法。

在陳水扁總統3日拋出一邊一國說法之後，中國大陸和美國的反應成了國際視聽的焦點。就在北京當局略有保留的強調台獨分子切勿錯估形勢之後，美方也在假期過後的第一個上班日作出回應。

據了解，由於陳水扁一邊一國說法引發台灣內部經濟與朝野的軒然大波，國安單位與兩岸政策主管部門陸委會已經達成低調消音的共識，對美以蔡英文主委親赴說明，對中則以不回應台辦說法為原則，而在野黨與政務官的說法也有特定說帖，各方在陳總統言論嗆聲之後低調隨之，用意不言而喻。

不過，對於台灣最在意的美方態度，國務院和台海政策系統人士，不但刻意壓低陳水扁一邊一國的姿態，甚至還以上海公報當中，台灣屬於中國的一部份加以定調美國台海政策，對台灣而言，可以視為美中台三方角力中，一個擦槍走火的失分。

美方的說法目前尚未獲得北京當局方面的回應，雖然這個對中國更大的善意，可以視為中國國家主席江澤民十月訪美的刻意氣氛營造。但值得觀察的是，北京涉台單位會否順應美方說法，將稍早錢其琛副總理提出的一中三段論壓低，不說兩岸同屬一個中國，反而強化台灣是中國的一部份內容，則可以據為推測台海走向的一個觀察點

拍手！

更何況,正常人再怎麼讀也看不出(三段論)比起(台灣是中國的一部分)有何實質軟化?從英文看,三段論說:
There is only one China; and both Taiwan and Mainland belong to China
這跟
There is only one China; and Taiwan is part of China有啥不同?

這批駐美記者就像是統瘋了一樣;先有位劉屏,硬要說美國人[主動地]唸一段上海公報,而這一定有其含意(按:意指對阿扁不滿);現在又出這位莊寶貝的神妙推論!夫復何言.本來無一物,何處惹塵埃!