AIM120空對空飛彈上有一種爬升增程模式，飛彈可以在發射後，依據目標的方位動態，自行爬升至最能有效利用動能、節省燃料消耗的高度，再對目標進行俯衝攻擊，此舉能大幅增加飛彈的有效攻擊範圍。這種模式在老俄的R-77原型AAM上付之闕如，是以解放空軍對其始終是看不上眼，且部份消息甚至顯示：R-77的獵殺動能與有效射程甚至及不上主動雷達導引化的改良型R-27。

To toga

這這這

假如改裝FORS感應器和新數位處理系統的 9B-1103M
至少紙上射程會比 R-27 好吧
具體的性能自然得看研究成果
這我就不清楚了

The R-27ER, while only semiactive, also outperforms the baseline R-77 (AA-12) in terms of kinematics. The R-77 motor has a simple, and short, burn profile, which has resulted in disappointing performance, piquing the Russian air forces interest in developing the K-77M rather than fielding the basic AA-12 in any numbers. The K-77M (K denotes a missile still in development, while R reflects an inventory weapon) is an upgraded R-77 with improvements that include a larger motor with a burn sequence profiled to increase range.

謝謝了，不過這句話不大對勁o，

>不過另外有一個可以看到各國每日軍情最新動態的英文網站可介紹給在下：

AvWeek: Su-30MK Beats F-15C Every Time
By David A. Fulghum and Douglas Barrie/Aviation Week & Space Technology
24-May-2002 11:20 AM U.S. EDT

The Russian-built Sukhoi Su-30MK, the high-performance fighter being
exported to India and China, consistently beat the F-15C in classified
simulations, say U.S. Air Force and aerospace industry officials.

In certain circumstances, the Su-30 can use its maneuverability,
enhanced by thrust-vectoring nozzles, and speed to fool the F-15s
radar, fire two missiles and escape before the U.S. fighter can
adequately respond. This is according to Air Force officials who
have seen the results of extensive studies of multi-aircraft
engagements conducted in a complex of 360-deg. simulation domes
at Boeings St. Louis facilities.

The Su-30 tactic and the success of its escape maneuver permit
the second, close-in shot, in case the BVR[beyond-visual-range]
shot missed, an Air Force official said. Air Force analysts
believe U.S. electronic warfare techniques are adequate to spoof
the missiles radar. That [second shot] is what causes concern
to the F-15 community,he said. Now, the Su-30 pilot is assured
two shots plus an effective escape, which greatly increases the
total engagement[kill percentage].

The scenario in which the Su-30 always beats the F-15 involves
the Sukhoi taking a shot with a BVR missile (like the AA-12 Adder)
and then turning into the clutter notch of the F-15s radar,
the Air Force official said. Getting into the clutter notch where
the Doppler radar is ineffective involves making a descending,
right-angle turn to drop below the approaching F-15 while reducing
the Su-30s relative forward speed close to zero. This is a 20-year-o
ld air combat tactic, but the Russian fighters maneuverability,
ability to dump speed quickly and then rapidly regain acceleration
allow it to execute the tactic with great effectiveness,
observers said.

If the maneuver is flown correctly, the Su-30 is invisible to
the F-15s Doppler radar--which depends on movement of its
targets--until the U.S. fighter gets to within range of the AA-11
Archer infrared missile. The AA-11 has a high-off-boresight
capability and is used in combination with a helmet-mounted
sight and a modern high-speed processor that rapidly spits
out the target solution.

Positioned below the F-15, the Su-30 then uses its passive
infrared sensor to frame the U.S. fighter against the sky
with no background clutter. The Russian fighter then takes
its second shot, this time with the IR missile, and accelerates
out of danger.

It works in the simulator every time, the Air Force official
said. However, he did point out that U.S. pilots are flying both
aircraft in the tests. Few countries maintain a pilot corps with
the air-to-air combat skills needed to fly these scenarios, said
an aerospace industry official involved in stealth fighter programs.

Those skeptical of the experiments say theyre being used to
justify the new Aim-9X high-off-boresight, short-range missile
and its helmet-mounted cuing system, the F-22 as an air-superiority
fighter and, possibly, the development of a new long-range air-to-air
missile that could match the F-22 radars ability to find targets at
around 120 mi. They contend that the Su-30MK can only get its BVR
missile shot off first against a large radar target like the F-15.
While its true that the Su-30MK would not succeed against the
stealthy F-22 or F-35, neither would it regularly beat the
nonstealthy (but relatively small radar cross section) F-16 or
F/A-18E/F, they said. These analysts dont deny the F-22s value
as an air-to-air fighter,but say the aircrafts actual operational
value will be greatest in the penetrating strike, air defense
suppression and electronic jamming roles.

At the same time, there may be more to the simulations than
justifying new weaponry, say European analysts. Also at play are
some tactical wrinkles being developed for the more effective use
of new Russian missile versions.

The combination of Su-30 and R-27ER/ET (NATO designation AA-10),
flown and fought in a competent fashion, also represents a
significant threat. Even though the R-27ER is only a semiactive
radar-guided missile, the extra maneuvering capability resulting
from the large motor is a significant improvement over the basic
R-27. Basic Russian air force doctrine has long suggested following
a semi-active missile launch immediately with an IR missile launch,
such as the R-27ET. Theory has it that the target aircrafts crew
will be occupied spoofing the inbound radar missile, only to fall
to the second missile.

The R-27ER, while only semiactive, also outperforms the baseline
R-77 (AA-12) in terms of kinematics. The R-77 motor has a simple,
and short, burn profile, which has resulted in disappointing performance,
piquing the Russian air forces interest in developing the K-77M
rather than fielding the basic AA-12 in any numbers. The K-77M
(K denotes a missile still in development, while R reflects an
inventory weapon) is an upgraded R-77 with improvements that
include a larger motor with a burn sequence profiled to increase range.

唉........看來我可憐的“新戰二部曲”已經徹底滅絕了，那可是截至目前為止的四部新戰系列之中，精華中的精華啊∼∼∼∼∼！！！！！

死ＣＩＰ，把我的慶祝4500HIT，賽車美人大姊圖還來∼∼∼∼∼！！！！！