馬英九等人
只不過是在阿扁 行政院的最後通牒下
才乖乖照辦而已
充分顯示出沒肩膀 被動懶散 意識型態掛帥 的死公務員心態
如今還敢沾沾自喜 在大庭廣眾下摟摟抱抱
簡直是恬不知恥也

在我看來
侯友宜局長才真正是鐵漢柔情
令人敬佩 感動
我們需要的首都市長 警方人員是 這種漢子才對
而不是縱容暴民做亂 毆打無辜大學生
而只在一旁觀看 最後卻逮捕被害人的廢柴 廢物啦

支持侯局長從政
侯局長加油啦

我期待馬市長能去和殯儀館員工抱抱
不要只會挑光鮮亮麗的柿子抱
畢竟平平是公務員
殯儀館員工的付出亦須肯定
然後 馬市長也該去街上和清潔隊員抱抱
因為他們清除暴民們遺留下的二十噸垃圾 真的很辛苦

但是馬英九是市長耶.能光靠著一張臉治理台北市嗎??大家喊他帥.台北市就所有問題都解決了嗎??

台中市的泛藍競選總部對製作此一海報得意洋洋，還認為極具創意，但是，當國際社會要採取行動抵制時，他們卻指責是Taipei Times蓄意「迫害」胡志強。他們的行徑猶如中正廟前輸不起的群眾嘴臉！令人噁心至極！

詳情請見Taipei Times網站的相關報導。

Taichung City officials fear Guggenheim project at risk

STAFF REPORTER

Thursday, Apr 01, 2004,Page 3

Officials in the Taichung City Government are worried that media coverage of a terror poster issued by the pan-blue campaign office headed by Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) may jeopardize the opening of a Guggenheim branch museum in the city, a source inside the government said yesterday.

The source said the Guggenheim Museum in New York yesterday contacted the Taichung City Government over the use of the terror poster. One official found the museums inquiry, which cited Taipei Times articles from last week and quoted questions by Times reporters put to Guggenheim press officer Jennifer Russo, unpleasant and, frankly, shocking.

The source said there was concern that the controversy could jeopardize contract negotiations with Guggenheim. However, the source implied there was a feeling that it was the Times that was responsible for this development and for resolving it, and not the pan-blue campaign headquarters for issuing the poster.

It was not clear what the response of the Taichung City Government was to the Guggenheim correspondence.

Around 600,000 copies were made of the poster, which likens President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) to al-Qaeda head Osama bin Laden and former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and uses an image of the attack on New York Citys World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, to convince voters to back Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜).

Among a stream of accusations, it accuses Chen personally of being capricious, haughty, reckless and greedy, and of embracing black gold (corruption), pitting Taiwans ethnic groups against one another and bringing unprecedented catastrophe to the country. The poster also provides a floor plan on how to avoid voting in the March 20 referendum.

Hu, a former foreign minister, distanced himself from the poster through a spokesman last Friday and in comments made on March 18, two days before the election, which were reported in the Taichung press, but other top campaign officials under Hu and pan-blue camp spokespeople in Taipei contacted by the Times have firmly backed the poster.

What you have said to Guggenheim may affect the destiny [sic] of our case, which you probably know, is at a very critical juncture right now, the source said.

The source suggested there was a feeling within the city government that any concerns the Guggenheim may have about the campaign materials were based on a big misunderstanding, and that, were negotiations to collapse, the heart and hope of the people of Taichung would break.

The source also said that there was a sense within the government that the Times was running a stepped-up news campaign against Hu personally.

The source warned that this [matter] seems to have gone already [sic] too far.

馬英九究竟是誰的馬市長？是國民黨的？是國親聯盟的？還是台北市民的？選後半個月，台北市短短幾百公尺的凱達格蘭大道，卻一直沒能平靜過，馬英九在「合法」申請中，保障了憲法賦予人民的集會自由，卻沒能在「就地合法」及「非法」中，保全除了集會群眾以外的，同樣受到憲法保障人民的行的權利。馬英九多數時候，選擇的是保障支持者，保全選票。

從320、327到403，還有被預期的410，集會正當性就在合法與非法中來來回回，從合法到非法再到就地合法，接著又從合法變非法，一場場非法集會的衝突謬劇，還有中央地方鬥法的政爭，都在凱達格蘭大道上演。

猶記得20日到21日那一夜，從合法集會到非法集會，到就地合法開始，馬團隊的危機處理能力，更顯不足。馬英九第一時間說，這是政治問題，不是市府有能力處理的，市府只處理環保及交通問題；台北市副市長歐晉德也為護主含淚哭訴中央政府不幫忙；主政的台北市政府兩大當家，都說沒辦法處理，讓群眾持續佔據道路抗爭一個禮拜，還非法搭起了舞台；27日，身為集會遊行主管機關市警局的頂頭上司，但馬英九還隨群眾上街頭。

但總算，一個禮拜後的327這一晚，馬英九終於卸下連宋總幹事一職，想起自己是台北市長，知道非法集會遊行強制驅離的主導權在地方政府不在中央政府的自己手中，總算，台北市民找回了台北市長。

馬市長這幾個月的雙重身份，讓他在320之後一時未能明辨，選擇保全泛藍支持者，保障了參與集會者憲法賦予的集會自由，卻相對剝奪了多數人憲法同樣賦予的行的權利。凱達格蘭大道及總統府週邊道路為了「就地合法」的集會，全部管制，禁止沒有相關証件的一般民眾通行，長達一個禮拜；默默沒作聲的人民，他們所擁有憲法保障的權益又在哪裡？

對全台灣大多數人而言，選舉已經結束，再有爭議，就交給司法了吧。馬英九在320那一天，就已不再是國親競選總幹事，於法且聲稱擁有驅離主導權的他，應該選擇做一個「全體」台北市民的台北市長吧，才不會因小失大，只做泛藍共主，才能有機會進一步做個「全民」的馬英九！(作者為本報政治組記者)

吳育昇指出，學生在中正紀念堂靜坐，交通沒有因此打結，也沒引發噪音問題，更沒有不正當訴求，只是表達訴求，市府原則上予以尊重，他不了解為何要以此粗暴方式對待靜坐的學子。